League of Women Voters Header
HOME   |   SEARCH   |  CONTACT US   |   SITE MAP              
Home > Action > Health Care > SB 840 Q&A >Section 2
  HEALTH CARE REFORM
SB 840 (Kuehl): The California Universal Healthcare Act
A viable and affordable solution for the health care crisis

In-Depth Questions and Answers

Public universal health care versus private health insurance

Why should anyone who is now privately insured support a change to a public single payer universal health care system?

 Every Californian is at risk and has a stake in supporting a solution to the health care crisis. Under the current system, few can be secure that they will always have access to enough health care or quality care when they need it. Now, there are many factors that threaten the  health security of those fortunate enough to actually have health coverage.

 According to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey, premiums for employer-sponsored family health coverage have increased by 73 percent since 2000, while wages increased only 15 percent concurrently.[1] Nationally, the number of employers offering health coverage dropped 13 percent between 2000 and 2005, which leaves only 60 percent of all employers that still offer health insurance.[2] Many employers are shifting premium costs to their employees and/or selecting policies with higher co-pays or policies with high deductibles. These deductibles must be met before the insured are provided care that is paid for by the insurer.[3]

 Billions of dollars are diverted each year from health care by the current fragmented health insurance and delivery system that wastes 20 to 30 percent of health care dollars on administration--excluding profit.[4] Californians pay about 50 percent more than Europeans, Australians, Japanese, and Canadians do for the same prescription drugs manufactured by the same companies.[5]

 Often, overcrowded emergency rooms have long waiting times, routine diversions of ambulance drivers and are not available to all patients who need them.[6] A national study finds that both insured and uninsured patients are responsible for much of the increased usage. Visits to emergency departments by the uninsured increased by about 10 percent despite a smaller percent change in the overall number of uninsured.[7] During the same period, visits to physician offices by uninsured persons declined by 37 percent. Higher caseloads and lower reimbursements from public and private payers compelled many medical practices to limit care provided to uninsured patients.[8]

 The study also finds that although emergency room use by the uninsured did increase, most of the increase in usage was from those insured by Medicare and private plans. Together, these insured patients accounted for about two-thirds of the overall increase in emergency room visits. The number of privately insured people alone accounted for more than half of the increase in usage during this same period.[9]

 The Institute of Medicine finds that Americans are experiencing an epidemic of sub-standard care, which they term a "quality chasm”—a wide gulf between the care needed and the care actually delivered to patients.[10] Each year an estimated 150,000 to 200,000 hospitalized people die from preventable medical errors and from infections acquired while in the hospital.[11] Deaths from misapplication of technology in all settings are estimated to be as high as 400,000, of which about two-thirds are preventable.[12]

 The United States ranks lower in overall population health compared to countries that have universal health care systems. In a comparison of health trends among 30 developed countries from 2004-2005, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development finds the US ranks ninth in life expectancy and 28th in infant mortality. Of these countries, only Turkey and Mexico experience more infant deaths per 1000 live births than the US.[13] 

 Nearly two million Americans filed for bankruptcy in 2001 because of medical bills, and 76 percent these people had health insurance when they became ill.[14]

 Being insured under the current multi-payer system affords no promise of health care security or care quality. SB 840 saves health care dollars that can be spent on providing care instead of administrative waste that occurs in the current multi-payer health insurance system. In contrast, SB 840 provides for a single payer health care system that eliminates or diminishes most of the above problems. Every resident will receive affordable and comprehensive health care based on a single standard of care. When everyone has health coverage and can choose his or her primary care doctor, long waits and overcrowded emergency rooms will no longer be the norm. The publicly financed universal health care system will provide for mechanisms such as system-wide health care planning and evidence-based care standards to improve care quality and prevent medical and technology errors. When everyone has comprehensive health care, no one will be at risk of financial ruin because of high health care bills.


[1] Ron French, “How General Motors and the nation are losing an epic battle to tame health care beast,” The Detroit News,,2006.

[2] Ibid.      

[3] John Garamendi. “Crisis in Health Insurance: Paying More for Reduced Coverage,” Priced Out: Health Care in California, 14, 2005. Accessed 01/24/06 from http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/0080-2005/upload/Priced-Out-Health-Care-in-Califonia.pdf

[4] John Gilman, Assembly Health Committee, Bill Analysis, SB 840 (Kuehl), Source: Author, 2006, 13. Accessed 08/22/06 from http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_840_cfa-20060822_201054_asm…

[5]  Ibid.

[6] Who is the blame for the health crisis? San Francisco Chronicle, 2006, B-6. Accessed 03/04/07 from  http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/31/EDGOBIPU011.DTL

[7] Peter J Cunningham and Jessica H. May, Insured Americans Drive Surge in Emergency Department Visits, Issue Brief No. 70, Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change, 2003, 2.  Accessed 12/17/07 from http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/613/?PRINT-1

[8] Ibid. 3

[9] Ibid. 2

[10] Building a Better Health Care System: Specifications for Reform, Washington, DC: National Coalition on Health Care, 2004, 10. Accessed 01/24/06 from http://www.nchc.org/materials/studies/reform.pdf

[11] Ibid., 11

[12] Ibid.

[13] OECD Health Data 2006, Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2006, 8, 10. Accessed  03/06/07 from  www.oecd.org/document/16/O,2340,en_2649_37407_2085200_1_1_137407,00.

[14] David U Himmelstein, Elizabeth Warren, et al, MarketWatch: Illness And Injury As Contributions to Bankruptcy, Health Affairs Web Exclusive, (Feb. 02, 2005): W5-63 – W5-73.  Accessed 04/30/07 from http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.63/DC1

Go to next section of Q & As on SB 840.
Return to main page for Q & A.
Return to main page on Health Care.

 

Feedback Home Donate to Us Search the site Contact Us Outline of the Site

The League is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization of women and men
which never supports or opposes candidates or political parties.

© Copyright. League of Women Voters of California. All rights reserved.
1107 Ninth Street, Suite 300; Sacramento, CA 95814.     916-442-7215     lwvc@lwvc.org